So let's state the problem. You need a website, but you can't afford a very good one.
So let me make a proposal. What if a hosted site could be provided, and a very reasonable fee, and included the following features.
- A highly configurable blog.
- RSS feeds for not only the blog, but podcasts as well.
- Two dozen pre-build page templates.
- Build as many template based pages as you need.
- Calender tool, add upcoming events to any page.
- User personalization tools (user login, preference settings).
- Password protected pages.
- Mailer forms (sales request, support request, etc).
- Page tracking plug-in via Google Analytics, Omniture, or Web-Trends.
- Online polls.
- Image optimization tools (for those without the tools).
- Photo gallery.
- Design support at hourly rate (for custom templates, graphics work).
- Application, site, and database monitoring.
- OS and application patching.
- Free upgrades.
What if you added to the list of canned applications. Perhaps you could add applications that you might find in an Intranet. Would you be willing to outsource your intranet? What if the applications could be run as a remote web service?
These are open questions. I have no answers.
Reference:
Do-it-yourself Software Services
Retailers buy into hosted applications
Hosted applications: Hosting gets hot
1 comment:
I've actually seen something like this for sites specifically for real estate brokerages. It's so long ago that I can't remember the URL-- at least 5 years ago now-- but it was quite slick... reasonably flexible/tailorable, modules you could pay for individually, a total cost around $100 per month for a very richly configured site (i.e. with lots of useful functionality for real estate selling/buying, contact management, lead capturing, interfaces to the MLS, etc., not "with flaming animated logos and lots of blink tags")...
I think you could do this on a reasonably domain-specific basis, i.e. "sites for amateur sports teams/leagues", "sites for publishing online magazines", "sites for small retail shops", etc. though I think to do it for a general case would be much harder because you can't figure out just the right use cases if you don't know enough about what the site is for.
Post a Comment